|
|
| Overshadowing |
| Furthermore
No 204 is located on the north side of No 202. I consider that
the proposed extension, because of its height and its proximity to
the boundary, would result in an unacceptable level of overshadowing. |
Planning
Inspector |
12/07/04
|
SOS/03/00685/FUL
|
|
|
|
|
| Character
and appearance |
| The building's
visual appearance clearly contributes to the overall street scene
|
Planning
Inspector |
|
|
|
The proposal's form
scale, massing and elevational design would result in an unsympathetic
change to the property that would neither respect the overall character
of the locality nor have a satisfactory relationship with its surroundings.
The proposal would not be in harmony with the existing property
and would harm the overall street scene.
|
Planning
Inspector |
|
|
| Although
the adjacent small terrace of houses...the effect visually when linked
together in a longer terrace building is quite different to that of
a single house. The proposals would be incongruous features in the
street scene, giving rise to unsympathetic change and an unsatisfactory
relationship with their surroundings. |
Planning
Inspector |
27/07/04
|
SOS/03/01076/FUL
|
| The building
would be relatively narrow compared both with its height and depth.
This would emphasise the vertical dimension of the building, not overcome
by some detailed features designed to mitigate this effect. In combination
these features would result in a cramped overall appearance. |
Planning
Inspector |
27/07/04
|
SOS/03/01076/FUL
|
|
